曬命解"沒有足夠知識基礎的情況下表露自己的小聰明",作這個解釋的是否香港人?--Anti webmob 20:21 2008年一月14日 (UTC)

Such meaning is of general sphere in which my boyfriend, doraemonserv, has paraphrased.

In actual example, by motif, Ben Ng never study sociology but he shows off a lot of games of lyrics such as utering "fundamentalism" so that the audience looks like small potato. As his professional malpractise (trusting jargans to show off PolyU Applied Social Science Lecturers with the sense of Mother Language Chauvinism) is malucuously kidding the insider of social science) persists and Ben Ng is NOT social scientist as he alleges the nature of science as 空想 so as to insult ALL pure science stream students, Such deed will be treated as MK, unless he can showlist the source of his learning. Otherwise, Ben Ng will still be treated as Bragger) Believe it or not, I can tell:

吳偉明拋書包被行家弄得走火入魔,blog 文素質因曬命閱讀率而漸見其拙

Theorems in politics applied:

  • Peter's law
  • Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

Proof: http://www.google.com.hk/search?complete=1&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=fundamentalism+site%3Awww.cuhkacs.org/~benng/Bo-Blog&spell=1


Both doraemonserv and me are mating HK citizens.

--Aiko Sunoo

我覺得 "曬命,又被寫作「晒命」" 好似啱啲

我覺得 "曬命,又被寫作「晒命」" 好似啱啲

除非另有註明,否則社區內容均使用CC-BY-SA授權條款。